Call to end ‘make-up discrimination’ for women of colour

Fighting colourism in the beauty industry

After years of being unable to access affordable make-up, Willink was excited about the launch of a new beauty brand, MCoBeauty, which was stocked exclusively at Woolworths and Big W and promised “luxe for less” make-up.

Willink was pleased to see a few shades that could work for her, though the range was still quite small.

When she saw the brand was on sale for half price, Willink carefully combed the aisles of multiple local supermarkets, to find that not one of them offered her shade, stocking almost exclusively ivory and beige foundations.

“I asked the manager on duty if they had any stock at the back or in other stores, so he searched the system and explained that the darkest shade available in any store in Australia was medium beige. They stocked four shades out of the 13,” she said.

The only way Willink could try these products was to purchase directly from the manufacturer’s website, which would cost her $38 including shipping, rather than the $13 in-store sale price available to those with lighter skin.

Finding the right foundation shade is extremely difficult to do when ordering online, creating yet another barrier to free self-expression and access to the same cosmetic experience most white women take for granted.

Willink posted a complaint about her experience on Woolworths’ Facebook page, and started a petition for Australian retailers to stock make-up that reflected the diverse skin tones of Australian women.

“My motivation was to highlight the inequality in access to products for people of colour and the lack of representation in the beauty industry in general,” she said.

See also  The Good Edit podcast challenges limiting narratives of Jewish women

“I wanted people to realise what has been happening in Australia for so long and to see how systems in society prioritise the needs of the white majority whilst ostracising those in minority groups.”

Retailers’ responses have been slow and often consisting of vague placatory statements with no tangible plans to do better for the thousands of women in a similar predicament.

Willink’s online activism has generated plenty of support and gratitude from women also frustrated with the racial discrimination in the beauty industry. Having to pay more or travel to specialist stores to buy make-up serves as a constant reminder of the broader discrimination and barriers to inclusion people of colour face on a daily basis.

Women of colour are already more likely to experience poverty, and face additional barriers to financial freedom, making more expensive products unaffordable, with the idea to simply “shop elsewhere” tone deaf and racially insensitive.

Excuses like insufficient shelf space, and unfulfilled guarantees of online price matches are inadequate and often insulting responses to what are legitimate critiques of powerful capitalist companies that are usually governed by boards of wealthy white people.

The lack of genuine representation is a serious failure on the part of retailers, who have only recently started including models with darker skin to present themselves as allies with performative displays of ‘diversity’.

The onus of progress towards true inclusion must be on corporations to create space for all people to be represented in their make-up shelves, rather than expecting individuals to constantly fight for basic visibility and equity.

See also  Why are there fewer young women in entrepreneurship than young men?